Quick Navigation
Stop guessing how to reference that AI‑generated paragraph—this guide walks you through the latest (2025) rules, complete with real‑world examples, a quick‑scan table, and non‑obvious pitfalls.
Why This Matters in 2025
- AI is now mainstream in academia. Surveys show that 86 % of students worldwide already use generative AI for coursework, and two‑thirds name ChatGPT as their first‑choice tool.
- Style manuals keep updating. APA, MLA and Chicago have each issued new or clarified guidance since mid‑2024.
- Universities treat undisclosed AI use as misconduct. Correct citation is the easiest way to stay transparent—and avoid an academic‑integrity investigation.
Quick Reference “Cheat Sheet” (2025)
| Style | Reference‑list / Works Cited Entry† | In‑text / Footnote Example |
|---|---|---|
| APA 7 (corporate author) | OpenAI. (2025, Mar 15). ChatGPT (Mar 15 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com | Paraphrase → (OpenAI, 2025) |
| MLA 9 (prompt‑as‑title) | “Explain quantum tunneling” prompt. ChatGPT, Mar 15 version, OpenAI, 15 Mar 2025, chat.openai.com. | (“Explain quantum”) |
| Chicago 18 (note only) | 1. ChatGPT, response to author’s prompt, 15 Mar 2025, OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com. | Subsequent note → ChatGPT. |
† Chicago treats AI output as non‑retrievable personal communication, so it does not appear in the bibliography unless you can provide a public, permanent URL.
APA 7th Edition (2025 Update)
1 ▸ Core Rule
Treat the developer (e.g., OpenAI) as the corporate author; cite the model as the title and list the version date.
Reference‑list template
Developer. (Year, Month Day). Model name (Version) [Large language model]. URL
2 ▸ In‑Text Options
| Scenario | Example |
|---|---|
| Paraphrase | (OpenAI, 2025) |
| Narrative | OpenAI (2025) claims … |
| Direct quote (include line breaks) | “Quantum tunneling is …” (OpenAI, 2025, para. 4) |
3 ▸ Where to Park the Prompt
APA recommends documenting your full prompt and the raw response in an appendix or online supplement; only short prompts may go in the Method section.
MLA 9th Edition (2025 Guidance)
1 ▸ Follow the Container Template
- Title of Source → your exact prompt, in quotes.
- Title of Container → ChatGPT.
- Version → e.g., “Mar 15 version”.
- Publisher → OpenAI.
- Publication Date → date you generated the text.
- Location → chat.openai.com (general URL).
Works Cited
“Explain quantum tunneling” prompt. ChatGPT, Mar 15 version, OpenAI, 15 Mar 2025, chat.openai.com.
2 ▸ In‑Text Shorthand
Use the first words of the prompt: (“Explain quantum”).
3 ▸ When a Citation Isn’t Required
If you used ChatGPT only to locate sources and did not quote or paraphrase its text, cite the actual sources—not the AI tool.
Chicago Manual of Style 18th (2025 Stance)
Chicago treats ChatGPT as personal communication (non‑retrievable data). All information lives in the note:
Long note
1. ChatGPT, response to “Explain quantum tunneling,” 15 Mar 2025, OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com.Shortened note
2. ChatGPT.
Do not place the entry in the bibliography unless you archive the full exchange at a public URL.
Step‑by‑Step Example (All Three Styles)
Prompt: “Summarize the double‑slit experiment in 75 words.”
| Step | APA | MLA | Chicago |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Capture version/date | Bottom of ChatGPT window → “Mar 15 version” | Same | Same |
| 2. Draft citation | See reference entry above | Works Cited entry | Note only |
| 3. Insert into text | (OpenAI, 2025) or narrative form | (“Summarize the”) | Footnote 1 |
| 4. Archive prompt/response | Appendix, OSF, or GitHub gist | Optional but recommended | Needed only if you want bibliography access |
Five Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Using ChatGPT as a personal author. Tools lack agency; corporate author = OpenAI.
- Omitting the version date. Model updates can change the wording.
- Forgetting the prompt. MLA uses it as the title; Chicago may require it in the note.
- Placing Chicago citations in the bibliography. Only do so if the content is publicly retrievable.
- Failing to disclose editing. If you edit AI text for style, note “edited for style” in Chicago footnotes or explain edits in APA appendices.
Ethical & Academic‑Integrity Checkpoints
- Transparency vs. ghost‑writing: Disclose AI involvement when it shapes substantive content.
- Plagiarism filters can mis‑flag: Keeping a prompt–response archive helps you prove originality.
- Bias & hallucinations: Cite responsibly—verify facts before quoting AI output.
Pro‑Level Tips Most Guides Skip
| Tip | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Archive the chat as a share‑link + PDF. | Gives reviewers a permanent record without login barriers. |
| Store model, temperature, and system‑prompt metadata. | Useful if you later replicate results. |
| Cite derivative AI images separately. | Treat DALL·E or Midjourney outputs as figures with their own credits. |
| Update your reference manager. | Zotero & EndNote now have AI‑citation plugins that auto‑pull version dates. |
| Check institutional policy first. | Some universities require an “AI disclosure” statement in the Method section independent of formal citation. |
Need a Second Set of Eyes?
Unsure your AI citations meet the latest rules? Our essay writing service editors will audit your paper, verify every reference, and ensure your appendix or footnotes are bulletproof—so you can focus on the research, not the red tape.
Pressed for time? You can always do my essay with the help of our experts, or buy college essays that meet even the strictest academic standards.
Key Takeaways
- Cite AI anytime you quote, paraphrase, or rely on its generated text.
- Match the 2025 rules of APA 7, MLA 9, or Chicago 18 exactly—each differs on author, title, and placement.
- Keep a transparent record of prompts and responses to defend your work.
Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free